Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Vox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Red Vox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability Guidelines not met Exemplo347 (talk) 08:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I originally PRODed this, it was removed with the apparent basis of "improvements " but there's simply still nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 01:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean the page will be deleted? (This makes me very angry— how freaking prissy and high standard Wikipedia is. This place isn't the Encyclopedia Britannica, quit acting like it) Anonymous64bit (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. References are from Reddit and Bandcamp, which is not acceptable. The only acceptable-looking thing is this, but it's poorly written and inspires little faith in the editorial quality of the publication--plus, it's really just a glowing write-up, not good journalism. There is no notable record label, no hits, no nothing, so the group doesn't pass WP:NBAND either. Drmies (talk) 12:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible to move this to a draft? This would take it out of the mainspace, and therefore wouldn't cause any problems. TheSheepGuy (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.