Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recursion Pharmaceuticals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. asilvering (talk) 06:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recursion Pharmaceuticals

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources and reads more like a promotional piece than a neutral encyclopedia entry. If most of the content comes from press releases or affiliated sources, OatPancake (talk) 10:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. OatPancake (talk) 10:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: OatPancake, what do you mean with If most of the content comes from press releases or affiliated sources,? --MarioGom (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.