Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Mixwell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Real Mixwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks reliable sources but has lots of refs to promotional sites, and I'm not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources. Bringing to AFD to get more eyes on this. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A lot of fluff and puff, but in the end, notability has not been established through significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Cindamuse (talk) 13:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.