Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RePOP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. $Salvio giuliano$ 10:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RePOP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for reliable sources on this topic didn't produce sufficient references to indicate notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Objects in Rearview Mirror (talk • contribs) 04:38, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An internal system used by one company at one point. According to content from an earlier version of the article, there exist no known RePOP server. There's no evidence that this even existed, let alone be notable. – SD0001 (talk) 10:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:36, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find anything. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 13:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also could not find any sources. Appears to be a relic of a former era when Earthlink was a larger player in the internet space. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:16, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.