Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razorworks

Razorworks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deproded claiming sufficient sources were found to pass WP:NCORP. I dispute that claim and believe the company still fails notability criteria, with the sources found being trivial coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and England. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Rebellion Developments. I could see a case being made for this article to be kept, but I think it would serve the greater good if the information from this article was moved into Rebellion's article, since they were the last owner of the studio before it was shut down. I don't think anyone is going to find any significant coverage to pass WP:NCORP given how short of a time the company was actually independent. Meepmeepyeet (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Empire Interactive. They didn't develop any games for Rebellion, all of their games were published by Empire so it's the more appropriate target. --Mika1h (talk) 08:14, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]