Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raw Run

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 22:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raw Run

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I initially WP:PRODed this with the following rationale: "Non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM that fails the WP:GNG. Neither of the included references are reliable sources, and searches did not turn up any coverage in reliable sources that discusses this term in sense that it is described here." However, I failed to notice that it had already been PRODed shortly after its creation in 2015, and thus would need to go to AFD. Rorshacma (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Sports. Rorshacma (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only reliable source that I could find with it was this article from CBS news, except it's only used there as the title of a self-published youtube video. I'd also note that it doesn't even appear on the longboarding article. Shaws username . talk . 21:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Gsearch brings up a ton of youtube videos, but I don't see any use of the term in RS like books or news items. Oaktree b (talk) 01:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.