Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational Business Developer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rational Software. No evidence of the subject meeting the wikipedia notability guidelines. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rational Business Developer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There are no independent sources Jcarlosmartins (talk) 09:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jcarlosmartins, bad sourcing is not a valid WP:DEL-REASON would you like to try another? ~Kvng (talk) 14:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any Wikipedia acceptable source. It seems like this is a non-notable article. Jcarlosmartins (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - No valid reson given for deletion and no response from nom. ~Kvng (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG - there is a total lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. There are literally no sources. An argument that a "valid reson given for deletion" was not provided is not serious in 2020. Bad sourcing is the number one reason we delete articles on Wikipedia. Just to be sure, let's do some online searches: a bunch of how-to manuals, eight articles tangentially about the product, and exactly minus zero articles in newspapers indexed online. Thank you. Bearian (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bearian, what do you think about redirecting to Rational Software as an WP:ATD? ~Kvng (talk) 20:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I do not oppose such a AtD. Bearian (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot keep a redirect if there is no referenced content on the page you want to redirect to. --Jcarlosmartins (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.