Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranknauseo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ranknauseo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a CSD A7, because WP:NOTCSD says neologisms cannot be speedy deleted, so I'm bringing it here as something that looks like it was made up one day and is completely devoid of any hits outside of Wikipedia space, reliable or otherwise. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete per nom. Andrew³²⁷ 17:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The title of the article does not appear in a "find on this page" of its one and only source. 79.123.57.130 (talk) 13:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I was the speedier, and I acknowledge that per WP:NOTCSD, my speedy was in error. Apologies. Storkk (talk) 15:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.