Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rank One
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rank One (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article subject fails WP:NCORP. Sources currently in the article are, in order:
- A press release;
- Non-independent coverage on a chamber of commerce's website;
- A second press release;
- A third press release
- A fourth press release.
An online search for additional coverage did not return WP:ORGIND-compliant reliable sources that covered the subject substantially. As the article subject fails to meet WP:NCORP, the article should be deleted. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 22:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.