Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randi Morgan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of All My Children characters. There is a clear consensus, that a separate article on this character isn't warranted. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Randi Morgan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This topic is never supposed to be created in the first place. I tried searching this character with 'randi "All my children" denise', and nothing significant (analysis, review, or statistical praise) comes up. To make matters worse, this article consists of only plot and is a mere biography of fictional character, which is against WP:PLOT. Somehow, DGG contested the PROD because notability is possible for every fictional character; this character doesn't pass WP:GNG for lack of significance, impact, and analytical interests. Her storylines have not been covered by scholars and reviewers, and even her relationships with others, including Frankie Hubbard, do not hold water.
Even "Introduction" section doesn't help prove this character's notability; in fact, it is a mere real-world addition to balance out fiction.
By the way, I'm aware of WP:ATD. Denise Vasi and Randi Morgan are two different people. "List of All My Children miscellaneous characters" is removed for copyright violations; List of All My Children characters is a mere collection of fictional characters, which is against WP:PLOT, and consists of very brief abstracts. This character has done some things that may make redirect to "Frankie Hubbard" out of the question. George Ho (talk) 08:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete No indication of wp:notability. Most of the article is just plot summary relevant to that character. North8000 (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of All My Children characters, already has an entry there. A412 (Talk * C) 00:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As I said, redirecting to List of All My Children characters, even if it has an abstract of Randi Morgan, is not my recommendation. --George Ho (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am proposing redirecting as an alternative to deletion, in that case. There's nothing wrong with redirecting there. A412 (Talk * C) 04:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As I said, redirecting to List of All My Children characters, even if it has an abstract of Randi Morgan, is not my recommendation. --George Ho (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources exist to WP:verify notability or make this more than a WP:PLOT summary, which is what wikipedia is not. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as usual for minor characters of this sort. That we not make a redirect when there is actually information in the main article or list sounds like an exceptionally wrong proposal to me, totally out of the spirit of WP:Deletion policy I deprodded not because it would in my opinion make a separate article, but because the results of discussions like this are variable enough that there should be one. at least if the character is in a major work. DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.