Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramana Sayahi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions make little in the way of serious arguments, and in particular do not cite appropriate notability-establishing sources when challenged to do so. Sandstein 22:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramana Sayahi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. The references are not any major news agencies. Random websites here and there. Ladsgroup^overleg 00:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Already got deleted in 2019, somehow magically reappeared again. Ladsgroup^overleg 00:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep she is meet GNG.--64.225.57.168 (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which references meet the criteria? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Because she has acted in several films that are famous, a person has the criteria of recognition of actors.--5.124.163.98 (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some analysis of the sources would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She is an Iranian actor who has acted in at least a few films and has a good reputation.--Gas Spray (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that she is notable enough? So why her biography was deleted in Persian Wikipedia?! Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brayan ocaner: yes, and the next thing, not having a wiki in a language is not a reason for not being famous. I can show you a thousand articles that do not exist in Persian, but are here.--Gas Spray (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can show you more than thousand of articles that exist here and has not Persian equivalents! in this case, her Persian Wikipedia page was deleted (not wasn't created), because of lack of notability, although Persian is her native language! It's definitely different with your example! Brayan ocaner (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Brayan ocaner:No, in my opinion, there is a taste in Persian wiki and no one pays attention to the sources if they do not like the article.It will be removed even if it is Ward Cunningham personal brush.--Gas Spray (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm getting the sense that this might be a paid/promotional sort of article, or there might be meatpuppery here -- especially with the many keep !votes on an article titled "Ramana Sayahi", a name that only has a single hit in Google news.
Regardless of that, there are a few pages of hits in Google news under her Persian name. But the ones I've found seem to be low-quality, tabloid-type websites or entertainment "news". The majority of the sources also seem to say the same thing - she looks like Angelina Jolie. I haven't seen a source yet that is useful for passing Wiki notability, so I'm leaning towards delete for now. - Whisperjanes (talk) 20:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.