Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qwertial Aphasia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 16:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Qwertial Aphasia

Delete. Fails WP:NEO. Neologism without any reliable independent sources. Contested prod. WWGB (talk) 03:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable neologism. A one-time mention in xkcd does not warrant notability. JIP | Talk 06:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While I personally find xkcd entertaining, we can't add every catchphrase and punchline here. Should this become some sort of a meme, it could be added here. By itself it's far from notable or widespread enough to have it's own article. Kotiwalo (talk) 07:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sadly, even Google could not help me find some reputable source that this is indeed, a medical term. Urban Dictionary and sites like that would be better off for this topic. --Scouto2 (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the page was PRODed on 1 July by User:WWGB with the concern "Neologism." Prod was contested on 1 July by 86.12.239.206 with the comment, "removed warning (better to have any definition than none at all)." I concur with nominator and PRODer WWGB that the page is a dictionary definition of a non-notable neologism. The only source is a cartoon strip that uses the phrase as its title. Delete. Cnilep (talk) 16:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:MADEUP or WP:NEO or both. Plus I'm not sure something like what is described could properly be termed "aphasia". Drawn Some (talk) 16:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A great joke, but not encyclopedic. Delete per self-admitted WP:NEO. Johnuniq (talk) 11:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.