Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuuxPlayer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- QuuxPlayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has been twice deleted per A7 speedy and PROD, now recreated again. Unsourced stub that fails WP:N; a Google search shows no clear notability of this software. Sandstein 17:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Sandstein 17:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - A CSD tag under A7 has been applied to the article being discussed here - assuming the deletion is successfully completed, I will be making an application to have the article salted to prevent its subsequent recreation here in the future. BarkingFish Talk to me | My contributions 20:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've removed the A7 tag, since this is a piece of software and not "a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content", which are the only things subject to A7 speedy deletion. Sandstein 21:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - A CSD tag under A7 has been applied to the article being discussed here - assuming the deletion is successfully completed, I will be making an application to have the article salted to prevent its subsequent recreation here in the future. BarkingFish Talk to me | My contributions 20:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow. Technically not A7. Still, no notability ascertained. — Hellknowz ▎talk 22:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: All the so called "reviews" that I can find are product descriptions. Joe Chill (talk) 23:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball and Salt per H3llkn0wz. FWIW, I had multiple WP editors, including an admin, 2nd opinion me on the deletion via a CSD A7/Web on Wikipedia's IRC channel @ Freenode, but I still say dump it. No use to man or beast! BarkingFish Talk to me | My contributions 01:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per reasons given by others. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.