Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QutIM (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. speedy as recreated article. No notable differences between versions GedUK 13:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- QutIM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This non-notable chat client has no third party sources and looking for them in the obvious places does not uncover any. Article was written by an SPA who has only edited this article and may have a COI. Miami33139 (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete under G4. I can find no WP:RS to establish WP:N 16x9 (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete under A7. NN as per OP. -- Alexf(talk) 12:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.