Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinjet

Quinjet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this one has a tiny reception section, except for [1] it's all listicles and mentions in passing, and even the linked Mary Sue article is poor - it talks mostly about plans for a theme park attraction, and its discussion of the item in question is rathers superficial (effectively, all useful content is quoted in our article - one sentence or so, with the claim that this is iconic/etc because of a wild guess proposed by the writer...). Meh. My BEFORE failed to find anything better. As such, I fear this fails WP:GNG, being just a barely-above-stub list of appearances and plot summary, plus an inadequate reception section. Per WP:ATD-M, I suggest this is merged to Features of the Marvel Universe or perhaps Avengers (comics). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation, and Transportation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. There aren't more than WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs of this topic in the resources, failing WP:GNG. The WP:SIGCOV is about Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe#Vehicles, which is an acceptable WP:ATD target. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:16, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the Features list per nom, since that seems to be the best place to mention this subject at present. Little to no coverage for the Jet specifically. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:17, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would Keep, but that's just me. Hyperbolick (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hyperbolick Can you provide a rationale? WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:ILIKEIT. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:06, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
more just a gut instinct with this showing up a lot in universe. Not losing sleep over it. Hyperbolick (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe#Vehicles per WP:ATD-M, as already suggested in the nomination. Why are we leading a deletion discussion in the first place when merging has already been identified as an alternative? WP:Deletion policy says "If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page" (emphasis mine). We do have a reception section here. Based on the current sources (no time to do a search myself) this may be inadequate for a stand-alone article, but from an encylopedic point of view this surely is preferable to the plot-summary we currently have at the target. A pure redirect would be a step backwards in terms of quality. Daranios (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe#Vehicles per WP:ATD-M. The nominator is open to that and so are other !voters. People will surely search for this but I agree that the minor quotes from a few sources don't give us a worthwhile article. Archrogue (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]