Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinabeer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cawy Bottling Company. King of 06:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quinabeer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One trivial ref and one blog. I can't find anything else via Google. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails General notability. Mr. Guye (talk) 07:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it's not independently notable the appropriate action would be to merge it into the parent article Cawy Bottling Company. Deletion wouldn't be constructive of helpful. I think it's fine as an independent article about two niche Champagne sodas popular in the Cuban-American community. Not hugely notable, but of interest to aficianados and foodies. Lots of these subjects at List of soft drinks by country. Whether we cover them in parent article or independently, it's best that we include them. We are a pageless encyclopedia and there is some coverage of niche sodas including this one. Candleabracadabra (talk) 11:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. This is certainly worth a redirect. I added one (sliver of a) reference; it's likely that there are more which Google Books can't give us, since they're old and Spanish, but I can't really vote "keep" on the basis of that hunch. Drmies (talk) 19:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.