Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quickbooks hosting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 20:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quickbooks hosting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary fork of Quickbooks, which already has a small (but reasonably sufficient) section on this. Was speedied once and subsequently prodded on recreation. Sending to AfD this time. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Borderline WP:SPAM, and no indication of sufficient notability per WP:GNG for its own article. Article's creator has so far included an external link for the hosting provider in every edit made, including to some articles that haven't been deleted yet, indicating a possible WP:Conflict of interest. Gurt Posh (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Reads like an advert, links aren't reliable sources. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 20:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sigh. Not sure what is notable about this concept; nothing more interesting than any other 3rd party hosting solution. Unsourced and unsourcable except for the fact that such services exist. Kuru (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested deletion - This page should not be speedy deleted because it was written to explain the differences between QuickBooks Hosting Providers (not specifically, but broken down by category.) We took the time to rewrite this awhile back because the original article was written poorly and primarily targeted to promote a specific service. The only solution that was listed in this article was Right Networks as they are Intuit's Enterprise Hosting Solution. This is information found on the software manufacturers own website... This shouldn't even be an issue.--Jboutin (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Who is "we"? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The owner of Right Networks and I. Nothing in this article was written for commercial purposes, as we link to all of the different forms of QuickBooks Hosting, and explain what people should look for when thinking about joining the cloud. --Jboutin (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.