Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuickShip.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

QuickShip.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in this orphan article that suggests this passes WP:CORPDEPTH and a BEFORE search also fails to turn-up anything. It has had unresolved maintenance tags for the last seven years. Chetsford (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- borders on A7; no incoming links. WP:TOOSOON or maybe never. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A longstanding WP:SPA article which is effectively a listing describing the company without indication of notability. I am seeing nothing better than the usual listings, none of the WP:RS coverage needed for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 13:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.