Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Query throughput

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Transactions per second. Sandstein 20:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query throughput

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Tooncool64 (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really understand how this is different from Queries per second? --94rain ^Talk 09:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused about the same. My understanding is that this article is talking about the database performance metric in particular, whereas the Queries per second article talks about the same performance metric applied to other systems. We could talk about merging the two, but as it stands a scholar.google.com search brings up a ton of articles discussing both. I really don't understand how/why the notability of this subject is being questioned. Sohom (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Query throughput, Queries per second, and Transactions per second are approximately equally (poorly) developed and referenced, and the subject area that encompasses all three would probably best be covered by a single article instead. It may well be that Query throughput is the best title for that article, but in any case I would support merging and redirecting any two of these articles to the third and then discussing a move on the talk page if need be. Jfire (talk) 23:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.