Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Pin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Queen Pin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources that I found were sites like IMDB, user reviews, and torrents. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Rotten Tomatoes entry, provided in the article, shows zero review. I could find a stub entry for the director in IMDB, but not an entry for the movie itself. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 01:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Per all --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG. Mynameislatesha (talk) 12:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per failure of WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- On a related note, I have just nominated the article on the filmmaker Gin X for deletion. It asserts notability based upon this non-notable film and two 2011 awards I have not been able to verify. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:16, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.