Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Que Peller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 16:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Que Peller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only references given are a blog and an advertisement placed by a person with conflict of interest. It should also be noted that notability is not inherited (from his father, who was a notable magician). Robert McClenon (talk) 19:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) @Robert McClenon| Hello, I have corrected the reference issues, and orphan link issues. Could you please remove the speedy deletion and close this discussion. Thank you.Ibrahim skillz (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional article with COI paragraphs. The subject does not beat the GNG benchmark since notability isn't inherited. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The article is indeed promotionaly written, but a reference search turns up numerous mentions, some of which are medium-quality sources, such as this. There's enough there to keep. He seems to be very widely mentioned in the Nigerian press. This makes me wonder if Systemic bias should be taken into account. 104.163.140.57 (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 10:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there seems to be plenty of potential online sources that how he is big in Nigeria, a market of over 60 millions. Bearian (talk) 20:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete instead as what's been shown in his career is enough, and suggesting "there's potential" is not what improves an article by itself and convinces us it's in fact acceptable, therefore there's currently enough to suggest it's simply unacceptable at this time. The listed award is not convincing and the other information is simply not convincing of a substantial article, hence delete. I also concur with the earlier comment of there being no inherited notability from simply another person, which seems to be the case here perhaps since it begins with said other person. SwisterTwister talk 02:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.