Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quassel IRC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quassel IRC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Here lies yet another non-notable software application which lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - i don't see any reliable sources to attest to the notability of this article. Theserialcomma (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 01:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Included in Tom's Hardware round-up, which also says: "Since version 9.04, Quassel is the default IRC client for Kubuntu". Also briefly reviewed here, and similarly covered in this interview. Granted, we might have to wait until the next batch of Ubuntu books hits the shelves for print coverage, but here is a tutorial (this is the blog of one of the Ubuntu dev teams, so more than a random guy's blog, and is independent of the Quassel developers). Pcap ping 17:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.