Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadrinational

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quadrinational

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO. That a word has been made up by and used by some junior doctors does not make that word a notable topic for an encyclopedia. For info: There currently isn't a Wiktionary article about this word. DexDor (talk) 20:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Maybe it could be redirected to Health care in the United Kingdom? Or is that a bad idea? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Devolution in the United Kingdom might be a better redirect target. DexDor (talk) 21:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No useful sources. A bunch of junior doctors having some fun. Ignore them. Dingo1729 (talk) 02:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wp:NEO The word doesnt appear in popular useage, no sources found in dictionaries online Amortias (T)(C) 21:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.