Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qlibc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qlibc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

more of an advertisement than an encyclopedic article; appears low popularity judging by search for web references and the software library's Web page forum activity. Suggest that notability is insufficient to merit an entry here. Rob.desbois (talk) 12:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, 12 dowloads at SourceForge. Francl (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Article is supported solely by primary sourcing (most of which currently links to dead sites, but that may be temporary). The subject matter is a utility library of common programming utilities and very standard set-theory based data types (containers, collections, whatever term you like); not a prayer of qualifying for WP:NSOFT. -- BenTels (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Most of the sources like this so-called 5 star article from Google search are primary sites. No really independent sources. This maybe a run of the mill software. --Artene50 (talk) 02:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.