Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q-go

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to RightNow Technologies. (non-admin closure) Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (orate) @ 09:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Q-go

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Only one in-line ref which is now a dead-link. Other external links are either dead, press releases or have a very tangential connection. Fails WP:CORP Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I found it trivially easy to find the dead link on the WSJ. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with RightNow Technologies. Praemonitus (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.