Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyla Avinash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to draftspace‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pyla Avinash

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricket player, fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS on a WP:Before. DWF91 (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Shellwood (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify or Delete. Fails to meet WP:NSPORT. No significant coverage about the subject and career in multiple published non-trivial secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. RangersRus (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The best I found was this [1] and this [2] Also a few sentences here [3] in New Indian Express. These more or less are all written from the single event of him being signed to play for Punjab Kings at the Indian Premier League auction. [4] He may have the potential to get significant coverage soon as the 2025 Indian Premier League starts in just a few weeks, so draftify might be an option here if significant coverage and BLP1E concerns can't be addressed at the moment?Canary757 (talk) 14:37, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Those sources are not enough to pass notability as they are not significant coverage and we cannot keep an article based on assumption that the subject might get significant coverage by participating in an event in the future. Better to delete and in future if the subject gets significant coverage to pass WP:GNG, and WP:NSPORT, then page can be recreated. RangersRus (talk) 21:28, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus looks clear-ish, but the nominator is now blocked so giving it more eyes
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:00, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Keep~~ Draftify. New articles published in last few days. This one is clear SIGCOV [5] also [6] a little here [7]. I definitely oppose delete, especially with the 2025 Indian Premier League starting very soon. The article does look like a draft and needs some TLC so I would not oppose a move to drafts if that gets further votes. Canary757 (talk) 12:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: I also think this is WP:TOOSOON. It would be better to draft it so that the creator can take more time to improve the article. Baqi:) (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.