User talk:DoctorWhoFan91

Semi-retired

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Your GA nomination of Hunter Schafer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hunter Schafer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 21:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hunter Schafer

The article Hunter Schafer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hunter Schafer for comments about the article, and Talk:Hunter Schafer/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 18:43, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on this article and congrats on the GA ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hunter Schafer

On 31 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hunter Schafer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that aged 17, Hunter Schafer (pictured) was a plaintiff in a successful lawsuit against an act preventing trans people from using the bathroom corresponding to their gender identity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hunter Schafer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hunter Schafer), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cielquiparle (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 46,262 views (1,927.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award for Hunter Schafer

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Hunter Schafer (estimated annual readership: 3,000,000) to good article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 12:46, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments

Hi HSLover/DWF, I had a look at your GA nomination Fire (1996 film) and compiled some comments below. My familiarity with articles on movies and LGBTQ+ is limited so it might be better if someone more experienced does the actual GA review.

Dilip Kumar said that he has not seen the film should it be "had not seen"?
On 7 December, activists from 32 organisations, including Campaign for Lesbian Rights (CALERI), protest against replace "protest" with "protested"
despite the police commissioner's reassurance that protection has been arranged should it be "had been arranged"?
A new lesbian rights group, calling themselves the Campaign for Lesbian Rights (CALERI), formed in response to the backlash. I think it should be "calling itself" - should be themselves in Indian English
viewers must ask tough questions from films the preposition "from" sounds odd to my ears - I'm not sure- pretty common expression in Indian English
the meager store income to treat the Swamiji's hydrocele condition should it be just "treat Swamiji's hydrocele condition" with "the"- Swami kind of means priest, so it's kind of complex if there should be a "the" or not
Mehta stated that the first scene that she imagined her was Sita and Jatin's visit the "her" sounds out of place; could it be removed?
to the Taj Mahaljust after their arranged space between "Taj Mahal" and "just"
their arranged marriage- a sister-in-law was then introduced should the "-" after marriage be a period or an em dash?
Bajrang Dal workers with lathis invaded Rajpalace and Rajmahal in Surat the source spells it "Raj Palace theatre"; I don't think it mentions a "Rajmahal "- yeah, couldn't find the og source, so removed that, new source doesn't mention the second by name
Mina Kulkarni, one of the Delhi protesters explained add comma after "protesters"
It is revealed that Radha faces a similar problem. Many years ago, Ashok had come under the influence of Swamiji, a local religious preacher, who teaches that desires are the cause of suffering and must be suppressed. should it be "taught" since the sentence is in the past? - I feel like it should be in simple present tense
takes place on their cultural life, whenever such issue comes up. the preposition "on" sounds odd; replace "such issue comes" with "such an issue comes" or "such issues come"
crying for the freedom of right to expression maybe better: "calling for freedom of expression" - No, they specifically emphasised that the right itself is fundamental
22 were arrested should this be spelled out as "Twenty-two"?
Rahman except for tracks add "the" before "tracks"
Furthermore, Thackery claimed should it be "Thackeray"?
is Spotify a reliable source?- sources like Amazon and Spotify which mention a product are usually considered reliable enough for GA at least, from what I have seen.
WP:EARWIG shows one potential copyvio with [1] but the page cites Wikipedia as its source

Phlsph7 (talk) 10:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Phlsph7. Almost all of your mentioned changes were helpful, and you also reminded me that I should give the article a grammar check. HSLover/DWF (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Fire (1996 film) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Fire (1996 film) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Fire (1996 film) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Fire (1996 film) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]