Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punetc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Punetc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, no significant coverage by reliable sources. creator appears to be connected with the film. Quasihuman (talk) 12:23, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NF. Aside from the COI, the official website suggests the film isn't even finished yet. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails WP:CRYSTAL. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 20:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All factors and searches considered, this article is simply WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable and blatant advertising. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.