Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Relations Global Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Public Relations Global Network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is currently sourced to the company's website, corporate filings, and press releases. BEFORE searches with PR agencies are always problematic as they return a huge number of results, however, diving deep into these they are almost exclusively contact lines in press releases for the company's clients, or completely incidental mentions such as staff members being quoted and then referenced by employer. Chetsford (talk) 01:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have to agree with this nomination. There doesn't appear to be a single reference that meets the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.