Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ptarmigan ACP
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ptarmigan ACP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not independently notable film company, apparently a single production of little note. The single production Blooded (film)is also at AFD and users may want to consider them together and any possible mergers and redirect options. The article was prodded and it was removed without any explanation by an IP with a first edit. Off2riorob (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack of coverage shows failing of WP:CORP. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 20:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Blooded (film) might be notable enough to keep, but the production company doesn't seem notable enough. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.