Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Providing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 05:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Providing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JTtheOG (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:NAD.--Tow (talk) 02:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article written like a dictionary entry. Should be deleted per WP:NAD. — Music1201 ^talk 05:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree that this article is nothing more than a dictionary definition and should be deleted on that basis. However, I am willing to change my mind if encyclopedic content is added to this article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a rather straightforward WP:DICDEF. I would suggest a soft redirect to Wiktionary, but that entry is "provide", not "providing". — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - literally a dictionary entry '''tAD''' (talk) 09:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.