Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposition for a Revolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition for a Revolution

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable crowd-funded project. Only supported by primary sources BOVINEBOY2008 23:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFILM and WP:NOTYET. (Of course, there could be Indian sources we're overlooking.) Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 15:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there were. Keep. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep unless there are further sound rationales presented, as Business Standard's article shows evidence that the current arguments to delete are in error. Anarchangel (talk) 23:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDAFD: Proposition for a Revolution

Keep Sorry nominator, but being poorly sourced is not a valid deletion rationale when sources exist, even if not used. In expanding searches, I find the topic of this planned film IS being discussed in detail in multiple independent sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] And more. The question now becomes one of does coverage of its planned production meet the caveats for notability as set by WP:NFF (paragraph 3)? I think, yes. It should be tagged for improvement, not deletion. IMHO. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw BOVINEBOY2008 21:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.