Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proper Einstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Einstein

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:MUSICBIO. Sources cited are PR blurbs, i.e. not WP:RS. Kleuske (talk) 23:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC) I went back and cited a couple of better references. I just hate to see this get deleted. It's not much but I worked hard on it. The Newbie06[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went back and cited a couple of better references. I just hate to see this get deleted. It's not much but I worked hard on it.

Better references? Where? Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — we're an encyclopedia, not a free public relations or social networking platform. The article cites no reliable source coverage about him in media, and makes no claim that he's accomplished anything that would pass WP:NMUSIC. So at best it's WP:TOOSOON. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he can be properly sourced as passing a Wikipedia inclusion criterion, but nothing here already satisfies the requirements today. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.