Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propane Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 19:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Propane Studio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, press releases are abundant, but little else. One mere mention in TNW doesn't seem to be enough to merit inclusion. SarahStierch (talk) 18:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SarahStierch, thank you for your assistance and help within the Propane Studio page. Upon receiving your message and mention of Teahouse, I would like to respond and ask for clarification or guidance in solving this issue. What are the necessary steps to take in order to prove the worthiness of the Propane Studio page, and how can we go about this? Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricaHugh (talk • contribs) 18:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should try to find newspaper or magazine articles about Propane Studio, as well as mentions in books, and also see if they've won any well-known and prestigious awards. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.