Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proof by verbosity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Proof by intimidation. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proof by verbosity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced essay. r.e.b. (talk) 02:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Proof by intimidation, which is a sourced entry on essentially the same idea. Ray^Talk 04:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I second RayAYang's proposal to redirect. Drmies (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and absorb Proof by intimidation into it. Both articles contain interesting and amusing material. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect per RayAYang, The second section is perhaps stronger there seem to be a few references to Argumentum verbosium on the web, but mainly blogs and forums.--Salix (talk): 03:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per RayAYang. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 09:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.