Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Planning Pro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Project Planning Pro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient indication of notability. The award they won comes from some non-notable site that seems too sketchy to be a reliable source. Without the award, this app just doesn't seem notable. IagoQnsi (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG due to insufficient reliable third party coverage, and per nomcrh23 (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom and also fails to pass WP:NSOFT from the sources I could find. Mwenzangu (talk) 02:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing better, article still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.