Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Baikal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project Baikal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (the Russian Science Citation Index strives to include all Russian-language journals, ROAD is not selective either), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no evidence that this new-ish journal meets any of our notability guidelines. Little to no coverage in independent reliable sources, and is not indexed in any selective databases (at least AFAICT). Everymorning (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.