Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project'Or

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While sources were offered, the consensus of the discussion is that reliable sources were lacking. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 17:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project'Or

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the general notability guidelines. OSborn^arf_contribs. 00:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some links that may help evaluate Project'Or notability
Independant references :

http://www.pearltrees.com/#/N-p=27639490&N-u=1_409152&N-fa=3565938&N-s=1_3568246&N-f=1_3568246

http://www.salto-consulting.com/tag/sonar/

http://wiki.framasoft.info/PropositionNotice/Projectorria

http://wapedia.mobi/fr/Project'Or_RIA

http://www.yakakliker.org/index.php?title=Applications/Gestion_de_projet&bc=0

http://www.barre.fr/blog/index.php?post/2011/06/10/Quelle-solution-pour-g%C3%A9rer-ses-projets

http://yannsymons.com/index.php/mes-favoris/demos-de-logiciels-libres/

http://www.d-a-l.com/help/general-internet-issues-questions/69927-trying-install-open-source-application.html

http://hailp.org/?q=node/39

http://forum.partipirate.org/travaux-technique/gestionnaire-projet-t5969.html

Individual CVs :

http://www.viadeo.com/profile/00284yj00b2p219

http://www.amplement.fr/nathalie-gruillot

http://www.emi.ac.ma/emiste/CVs_Ing_EMI_2011/Informatique/Syst%C3%A8mes%20d'information/Moumin-Cv.pdf

External deployement of tool (not sure what they stand for) :

http://we-interact.com/projectorria/view/main.php

http://stitchmage.com/servers/gold.qmuxs.com/htdocs/view/main.php

http://highautomation.com/pj/projectorria/

Hope it helps. pascal.bernard 16 November 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 15. Snotbot t • c » 19:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 00:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The sources above do not show notability. SL93 (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete: Internshit report of product usage, by Simon AUBRY, showing notability : :http://www.deltaprod.free.fr/files/IIE3-STAGE-simon.aubry.pdf

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All of these references seem to be from forum posts and non-notable blogs. I don't see any real news mentions. Graymornings_(talk) 22:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete: see Internshit report above. In french. Explicit reference similar to book or "non internet" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babynus (talk • contribs) 16:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the links at the article or provided here seem to provide significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The "internshit" (really?) report seems to be simply a consultant report; all it does is confirm that the software exists. None of the other links are from independent reliable sources. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.