Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progreso Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Progreso Networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence for notability-- the refs are mere mentions DGG ( talk ) 19:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 20:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am the original author of the page, and I have had a look after a long time. I am stripping out the non-IPv6 Forum (a not-for-profit advocacy forum based in Luxembourg) stuff, and will welcome a review. Disclosure: I was involved with bringing the Forum to Singapore in 2011, and convincing Progreso to provide secretarial and administrative support to the Chapter. -- Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta 03:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghane (talk • contribs)
I would like to move the page from 'Progreso Networks' to 'Progreso Training'. I have removed the content for PN, the parent company, the article is now only (as far as I can tell) about PT, which focusses on IPv6 training and advocacy. Could someone who knows better than me the implications of this please say yes or no? -- Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta 03:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

No, I disagreed to the deletion of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.185.129.194 (talk) 05:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As discussed above, the article has been repurposed since the AfD nomination. It was then about Progreso Networks Pte Ltd but is now about Progreso Training Pte Ltd. I am not finding significant coverage of either firm. In addition, a large proportion of the article content is about the Singapore chapter of the IPv6 Forum. Even if that group were notable, notability cannot inherit from a group (or from material about the extent of IPv6 adoption in Singapore) to a training firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per AllyD.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.