Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profit efficiency

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Profit efficiency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; can't find any sources supporting this concept. A quick JSTOR search for "profit efficiency" only shows the term being used to refer to the profit margins of firms, not the level of rent-seeking in the overall economy. Qzekrom (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is a reason why this article is unrefenced, and that is because this is not an accepted term in finance or economics. The phrase "profit efficiency" can appear in different uses, but there is not defined term or concept of "Profit Efficiency". Britishfinance (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not notable. The wording exists but as an actual term or concept it is mostly relegated to banking. Seems to be an attempt at promoting an unsourced neologism. Otr500 (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's possible this is a notable topic, but this unsourced, essay-like, article isn't worth keeping. If somebody wants to write about this, they can start from scratch. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.