Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProfNet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ProfNet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No references in the article, the two external links are to the websites of ProfNet and its parent company PR Newswire. I can only find examples of trivial coverage and press releases on Google. Pahunkat (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 22:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as per nom, fails WP:NCORP --Whiteguru (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A Google Scholar search isn't helpless. This looks reasonably independent and in-depth, as does this, and this looks okay. There's also a master's thesis from 2000 that I can't access at the moment, maybe not as great as a peer-reviewed paper but more than nothing. Between that and a Google Books search, it was easy to go from zero references to five, and I haven't tried JSTOR yet. Looks like a merge candidate at worst, and there's a ready merge target already suggested. XOR'easter (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.