Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prody Parrot (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Agent 007 (talk) 18:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Prody Parrot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT The page was recreated while still not meeting notability criteria. Clenpr (talk) 08:08, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. I found this review in PC Mag, this piece in the Arizona Daily Star, this in Electronic Design, and this in the Journal of Commerce. There's also this article mentioning that it won an award from the Smithsonian and was included in the Smithsonian Permanent Research Collection. And there's this mention in Information Week, but I can only access a snippet. I also found quite a few recent sources that mention Prody Parrot as one of the earliest examples of a digital assistant, but none that provide SIGCOV of it. Together I think it's probably enough to meet WP:GNG. MCE89 (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:04, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Keep per sources found above Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep it appears to be notable per new findings above. It moderately passes WP:N and WP:V. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.