Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Process 55
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 10:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Process 55 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can find no significant reference in independent media Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article creator appears to be the development firm and the article lacks any independent refs; I am surprised it has survived unchallenged in this state for over 4 years. I have found no reliable 3rd party sources. AllyD (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Orphaned for three years. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unreferenced, fails WP:NSOFT. --Drm310 (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.