Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prison blogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prison blogs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LINKFARM, linking only to external sites, with no other content besides that. Clearly unencyclopedic. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Internet. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unencyclopedic WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unencyclopedic per WP:LINKFARM Encoded Talk 💬 20:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rescope - The current content is hardly salvageable, but there is some academic sources that make the topic notable.--cyclopia ^speak! 10:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NOTGALLERY, also barely notable in my opinion. Except for a couple in here that could warrant either their own page, or a paragraph on the person's page. Aknip (talk) 15:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.