Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality of Ulek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Flanaess. Mz7 (talk) 02:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Ulek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 11:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Flanaess; there's nothing to merge as the copy is uncited (since 2009) and is strictly in-universe content. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Flanaess, or merge if preferred. I would recommend a merge to Ulek States, but I'm a long way from convinced that that article should exist. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Flanaess. I don't see how it's own stand alone article is appropriate. Longevitydude (talk) 02:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Flanaess. -- Dane ^talk 01:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Flanaess as above. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.