Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prezzee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prezzee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I speedied this following a G-11 speedy request, but the main editor has requested that it be restored and brought to AfD, so I'll leave it to the community to decide if this reaches the threshold for G11, and whether in any case it's notable enough. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify - clearly simply an advertisement for the company in its current incarnation. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-Speedy Delete - An obvious advertisement that falls in G11. U683708 (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. Yet another piece of spam for Precision and Bonett. Who is getting paid for this one? duffbeerforme (talk) 01:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SERIESA. FalconK (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.