Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preetha Ram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 05:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Preetha Ram

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, secondary sources found about the subject. The article was previously PROD'd and contested back in 2009, so it seems that an AfD is the only course of action available here. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Businesspeople, and Women. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lemme list some points. The following can be reasons for deletion. - Mike 01:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1. The article is based mostly on one source.
2. Don't look at the extended part; it's basically the same information.
3. Doesn't have enough good sources that can be found online.
4. And yes, no independent or secondary sources.
- Mike 01:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage; assistant deans are commonplace. Bearian (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Largely concur both with Bearian's comment and with the comment's made by HwyNerd. There is a good case for WP:TNT given the current state of the article as well. But generally the article doesn't have the widespread and independent secondary coverage necessary to warrant notability. GuardianH 04:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have made my decision. Based on the four points I listed above, this article is not reliable for information. HwyNerd Mike (contribs | talk) 20:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.