Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Nathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prakash Nathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Media professional fails WP:GNG. Written like a puff piece. Cant seem to find any reliable sources on the subject. FITINDIA 11:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was just about to start nominating when you saved me the effort. The sources are either self-published, quotations in news articles, or press releases. I too couldn't find anything WP:RS. Fails WP:NBIO. Narky Blert (talk) 11:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A biography with non-encyclopaedic promotional text and a history of WP:COI editing. If the considerable ballast of PRspeak was removed, little would remain but the career CV of a man with a job. Occasional in-role citations are mundane and do not establish encyclopaedic notability for the subject. AllyD (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is written more as a Resume/CV of the individual and a clear case of WP:SPIP and fails to establish any notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG Hagennos (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.