Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Calculator
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Microsoft PowerToys. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Power Calculator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is almost nothing in the vast array of XP books on this add-on utility. I found a mention in this book [1], but it's too trivial to count as in-depth WP:SECONDARY source. Web reviews of the PowerToys don't give it any extraordinary attention either, e.g. [2], [3]. So, I don't see why a separate article is justified. Pcap ping 13:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 13:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it's your judgement call whether the coverage is "too trivial", and there is no requirement for coverage to give the subject "extraordinary attention." There is sufficient coverage out there. Little Professor (talk) 12:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Microsoft PowerToys: Similarity of context allows a merger that should mitigate the notability issue. Fleet Command (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thoughts, I support the merge suggestion above. Little Professor (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep trivial is a judgement call, the article seems relevant. Justin talk 10:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.