Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Analytics (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Power Analytics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and has apparently had no real references related to the company since the article creation in 2011. I can find no sources that pass WP:CORPDEPTH, all press releases. The company had a previous article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDSA Micro Corporation, I can find even less about a company with that name. It looks as though this article used to be about a general concept, but that article did not cite any specific sources and a search on that phrase in general has not been very fruitful. shoy (reactions) 21:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no assertion of notability, no references, just promoting a company name. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:CORP as well as WP:GNG. Skirts89 (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete purely commercial content Gumsaint (talk) 00:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt. No single RS that would give this company notability (probably why article is fully un-referenced). Very promotional article written like a brochure. This will need salting as the article was re-created from a previous deletion, and as recenty as February 2019, a PAC Team had to be blocked indefinately due to promotional editing on this article. Britishfinance (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability tests. Salt per previous AfDs --DannyS712 (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.